Medicine of the Future in America

Tag Archives: Pneumonia

Antibiotic Timing and Diagnostic Uncertainty in Medicare Patients With Pneumonia: Recommendation

This may have been in part due to our low sample size or the presence of other factors such as ED patient volume and staff/patient ratios that could affect the timing of the administration of antibiotics. This result could also suggest that the reviewers’ finding of diagnostic uncertainty was not relevant to what actually occurred when these patients were treated. However, this seems unlikely, given the lower frequency of physical examination and chest radiograph findings and frequent evidence of diagnostic uncertainty in the medical records of these patients. A more likely interpretation is that the timing of antibiotic administration performance measure prompts antibiotic treatment as soon as respiratory symptoms are elicited, often before a diagnosis of pneumonia is confirmed.
Continue reading

Antibiotic Timing and Diagnostic Uncertainty in Medicare Patients With Pneumonia: Conclusion

Antibiotic Timing and Diagnostic Uncertainty in Medicare Patients With Pneumonia: ConclusionIt may be inappropriate to expect hospitals to deliver antibiotics to all pneumonia patients within 4 h of presentation, as doing so would necessitate antibiotics being administered to many patients in whom the diagnosis of pneumonia would still be in doubt.
There is already concern that a target of 100% leads to inappropriate antibiotic use, which could decrease the yield of subsequent diagnostic tests in some patients and could stimulate the development of antibiotic resistance. Perhaps most importantly, efforts to achieve a target of 100% might result in the diversion of limited resources from other patients who might be more in need of prompt care. http://canadianhealthcaremallinc.com/

Continue reading

Antibiotic Timing and Diagnostic Uncertainty in Medicare Patients With Pneumonia: Discussion

Acute mental status changes were almost twice as common in patients with diagnostic uncertainty, but this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.12). The lack of rales, oxygen desaturation, or a chest radiograph suggesting pneumonia were all significantly more common in patients with diagnostic uncertainty. It is noteworthy that among these 78 patients, all with a hospital discharge diagnosis of pneumonia, 19 (24%) did not have a chest radiograph finding that was suggestive of pneumonia. Two of these patients also had a chest CT scan that did not demonstrate an infiltrate. Twenty-one of the patients (27%) who had been admitted to the hospital through the ED received initial antibiotic therapy > 4 h after presentation. Thirty-eight percent of these patients had abdominal symptoms, while only 11% of those without delayed antibiotic administration had abdominal symptoms (p = 0.005). None of the other clinical factors listed in Table 1 were associated with the receipt of antibiotics after 4 h. Table 2 demonstrates the association between the mean time to antibiotic administration and patient characteristics. A significantly longer time until the receipt of antibiotics was associated with hospital admission from a facility other than home. Patients with abdominal symptoms received antibiotics a mean of 2 h and 23 min later than patients without such symptoms, but this difference fell short of achieving statistical significance (p = 0.07). storehealthmall.eu

Continue reading

Antibiotic Timing and Diagnostic Uncertainty in Medicare Patients With Pneumonia: Research

Antibiotic Timing and Diagnostic Uncertainty in Medicare Patients With Pneumonia: ResearchOften, while pneumonia was listed by the ED physician as one of the final diagnoses, heart failure or exacerbation of COPD was also mentioned, and frequently was listed above pneumonia. In six of these cases, the reviewers felt that antibiotic treatment would have been appropriate for any alternative diagnosis (usually an acute exacerbation of COPD), but it would have been appropriate for the ED physician to defer the antibiotic choice to the admitting physician.
Among these 19 cases, there was initial interobserver disagreement for 14 cases (74%). There were three specific reasons for initial disagreement. In two cases, a reviewer overlooked a key piece of the data in the record, and once this was pointed out he changed his opinion. More often, the differences were due to diagnostic uncertainty.

Continue reading

Antibiotic Timing and Diagnostic Uncertainty in Medicare Patients With Pneumonia: Results

The report of pneumonia, infiltrates, consolidation, opacity, or a similar synonym was accepted as representing pneumonia unless the conclusion made no mention of pneumonia and contained an alternate diagnosis. Summary statistics and univariate tests of association were performed. The x2 test was used for categoric variables, and the Student t test was used for continuous variables. Statistical significance was accepted at p = 0.05. Analyses were conducted using a statistical software package (SAS, version 8.0; SAS Institute; Cary, NC). As a component of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services quality-improvement activities, this study was exempt from institutional review board approval.
Continue reading

Antibiotic Timing and Diagnostic Uncertainty in Medicare Patients With Pneumonia: Methods

Antibiotic Timing and Diagnostic Uncertainty in Medicare Patients With Pneumonia: MethodsEach chart was reviewed independently by the reviewers, who were asked one key question, as follows: was there a potential reason for a delay of antibiotic administration other than quality of care? It was anticipated that such cases in which the answer was “yes” would generally be due to diagnostic uncertainty such that the diagnosis of pneumonia would likely not have been made soon enough to deliver antibiotics within 4 h. Inherent in this designation was acceptance of the premise that in the absence of diagnostic uncertainty or an unusual patient-related circumstance that prevented the timely delivery of antibiotics, a delay in antibiotic treatment represented a lapse in quality. canadian neighbor pharmacy online

Continue reading

Antibiotic Timing and Diagnostic Uncertainty in Medicare Patients With Pneumonia: Materials

Randomly selected charts of Medicare patients with a hospital discharge diagnosis of pneumonia fulfilling the criteria for inclusion in Medicare pneumonia reporting were made available to the investigators. The criteria for inclusion in the Medicare reporting have been described in detail previously. A key inclusion criterion for the antibiotic timing measure was that pneumonia had to be among the diagnoses being considered at the time of hospital admission. A confirmatory chest radiograph was not required. Patients with documented antibiotic treatment within 24 h prior to presentation were excluded. A sample size of 80 to 100 patients was planned, due to investigator time and resource constraints, as this was an unfunded study. With this sample size, an analysis prior to commencing the study revealed an acceptable predicted 95% confidence interval based on an anticipated prevalence of diagnostic uncertainty of at least 15%. read

Continue reading

Antibiotic Timing and Diagnostic Uncertainty in Medicare Patients With Pneumonia

Antibiotic Timing and Diagnostic Uncertainty in Medicare Patients With PneumoniaThe Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services conducts a multipronged program to encourage improvements in quality of care for Medicare beneficiaries. The timing of antibiotic therapy for patients who have been admitted to the hospital with pneumonia has been an audited performance measure for pneumonia for many years, as reports have demonstrated improved outcomes among patients who received antibiotics within 4 h of presentation. With the recent trend of using this and other performance measures as the basis for public reporting and pay-for-performance programs, there is increasing pressure for hospitals and physicians to drive their performance rates as high as possible. The only way to ensure not being outperformed by another institution in the competition for reimbursement (in many pay-for-performance programs) or for patients (in the case of publicly reported quality measures) is to achieve 100% adherence. there

Continue reading

Rapid Clinical Diagnosis of Pulmonary Abnormalities in HIV-Seropositive Patients by Auscultatory Percussion: Conclusion

First, the kappa coefficient is a measure of agreement independent of reference to the gold standard and therefore does not measure accuracy of the test. Secondly, ROC analysis examined accuracy based on a sum score that weighted equally positive results by any of the techniques, whereas the kappa calculation requires agreement on result for each technique among examiners. Finally, kappa coefficients are affected by prevalence as are positive and negative predictive values, so that even with a high percentage of observed agreement, the kappa coefficient can be low. We have shown that AusP adds to the sensitivity of the standard examination of the chest, especially when used in populations with a high prevalence of pulmonary abnormalities. The likelihood ratio also shows superiority of AusP over ConA and ConP. No abnormalities were detected by ConP that were not detected by AusP. Given this information, we can say that the ideal screening physical examination of the lung in this population would consist of ConA and AusP rather than ConA and ConP. canada health and care mall

Continue reading

Rapid Clinical Diagnosis of Pulmonary Abnormalities in HIV-Seropositive Patients by Auscultatory Percussion: Discussion

Rapid Clinical Diagnosis of Pulmonary Abnormalities in HIV-Seropositive Patients by Auscultatory Percussion: DiscussionIn 1980, Guarino published the results of a controlled blind study in which 30 patients with suspected lung disease were examined by one examiner using both ConP and AusP. Using the chest radiograph as the gold standard, the examiners found AusP to be more sensitive than ConP detecting 27 of 28 lung abnormalities.
Recent work has not confirmed initial observations of the usefulness of AusP. In 1989, Bourse et al attempted to determine the diagnostic value of ConA and ConP again using the chest radiograph as the gold standard. Fifty random patients who had a chest radiograph at the time of hospital admission were examined by two physicians alternating between AusP and ConP. Twenty-six of 100 lungs had radiographic abnormalities. No time frame was given as to when radiographs were taken in relation to when the examination was performed. These examiners found ConP to be 15.4 percent sensitive and 97.3 percent specific and AusP to be 19.2 percent sensitive and 85.1 percent specific. mycanadianpharmacy

Continue reading

Copyright © 2012 Medicine of the Future in America www.perfexis.org